Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:06:47 +0200
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do recent bugs filed against Libre 3.4 need to be refiled with
 apache tracker?
Message-ID: <20111109180647.GA15073@daniel3.local>
References: 
 <CAP-ksohioiyL6N2_5OFWssAsrFqihg6FnTy2mJckdo_q_VjmUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1320855125.3971.YahooMailClassic@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <CAP-ksogs8Wsg-fioXo8=jLiiksge8_fUF9r0j+u28ZURgBiwhw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksogs8Wsg-fioXo8=jLiiksge8_fUF9r0j+u28ZURgBiwhw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:49:56 -0500:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hello David;
> >
> > If you find a bug in OpenOffice.org file it directly
> > on Apache's bugzilla. Duplicate bug reports are fine,
> > they really are.
> >
> > So far I am the only one in the business of actually
> > committing fixes to issues, so trust me and ignore
> > completely what Rob suggested. I will act with extreme
> > prejudice ignoring any bug report linked to libreoffice
> > on the principle that such contributions or the resulting
> > followups are not made under a compatible license. I won't
> > even look at them.
> >
> 
> Do you really think the facts expressed in a bug report are covered by
> a license?  I'm not talking about patches, but the facts of "Do X, Y
> and Z and Calc crashes?".   If you think that, then I think you are
> mistaken.

I wonder if there's a room for shared bug tracking --- i.e., people
enter a bug once, and then the fix is tracked N times, once for every
set of incompatible licenses the fix is developed under.

(initially N=2)