incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Licensed Fonts (was Re: Font related questions)
Date Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:05:42 GMT
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:
> I welcome anyone who is willing to share the PITA burden concerning licensing, IP, terms-of-use,
etc.
>
> With regard to the NOTICE file.  In a binary release, yes.  If the work is being embedded
somehow and/or installed in some manner, the NOTICE that is included in the executable install
location should include it.  This applies to third-party category A also.  Dependencies
on the licenses of other are always acknowledged.
>

So do we need two versions, one for source releases and another for
the binary release?

-Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:pfg@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:36
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Licensed Fonts (was Re: Font related questions)
>
> [ ... ]
>
> But I am not in the business of being a PITA for
> the project, I just think this has to be reviewed
> by legal.
>
> While here a general question: do we have to mention
> "Category-B" software in the NOTICE file?
> I say we shouldn't since we are not including any
> source code for that in in the SVN server or in
> the releases, we will just use the binaries if
> they are available.
>
> Pedro.
>
> Pedro.
>
>

Mime
View raw message