incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process
Date Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:42:44 GMT
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<dennis.hamilton@acm.org>wrote:

> ++++++1
>
> A little tuning, for what it is worth:
>
> It is not necessary to subscribe to any of these lists in order to ask for
> help.  They will be moderated in.
>
> It might be nice if the mailto: entry specified a subject that would let
> us know it is from the request link though.  That would emphasize that the
> requester is probably not subscribed and a direct CC: on any response is
> called for.
>

yes, of course...


>
> Also, ooo-users might be a better target than ooo-dev.
>

Why? These would be people reporting problems with the staging web site,
not the product ????


>
> And, if within-site relative URLs are used for some cross-references, they
> will work when the cut-over happens as if they were always links to http://*.
> openoffice.org URLs.  That way it is never necessary to expose
> ooo-site.apache.org addresses.  (Cross references to the podling site are
> different, of course and they will hopefully all be redirected on
> graduation.)
>
> At some point, it should be fixed so http://ooo-site.apache.org redirects
> to http://openoffice.org (even though the pages are actually created at
> you-know-where, that can be made to work without looping [;<).  It can also
> be arranged that http://ooo-site.apache.org/es/ is served up as
> http://es.openoffice.org, etc.
>

yes, that is right...

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.schenk@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 15:22
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, TJ Frazier <tjfrazier@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11/3/2011 17:59, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>
> >>  I'm thinking of changing the links on:
> >>>
> >>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/**projects/native-lang.html<
> http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html>
> >>>
> >>> to the format we're using at the staging site--
> >>>
> >>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/"**nl-abbreviation"
> >>>
> >>> and putting a link on the staging home page
> >>>
> >>> http://ooo-site.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> to the revised http://ooo-site.apache.org/**projects/native-lang.html<
> http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html>
> >>> at the bottom of the menu with something called "Native Language
> >>> Federation"
> >>>
> >>> to make it easier for folks to review the N-L sites.
> >>>
> >>> Due to the fact that we are now missing the navigating tabs on the
> >>> staging
> >>> site, we may want to deal with other areas like this as well for the
> time
> >>> being until a more in-depth discussion is had. This is merely for
> >>> checking
> >>> content accuracy for the time being.
> >>>
> >>> Are there any problems with this suggestion?
> >>>
> >>
> >> +1000
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>> I can probably get this done over the coming weekend sometime.
> >>>
> >>>  Kay,
> >
> > You might consider a new column, which would have either a constant like
> > "Review" or "New site" (with new link), or be empty for "not moved yet".
> A
> > sentence about "What do I do if I find a problem?" should be aimed at
> > unsophisticated end-users.
> >
>
> Well the thing is the sites "are moved" in the sense that they're in the
> svn repository for the staging site. I'm not exactly sure what Dave is
> doing at the moment in terms of preparation to tell you the truth, but I'm
> fairly certain we've got everything that could be had "svn-ing" what was
> publicly known .
>
> However, the  "What do I do if I find a problem?" link/page certainly has
> merit. About the only thing I could suggest though is an e-mail to this
> list (and they need to be subscibed first), and suggest an appropriate
> subject title to them so we could spot these things easily. Would something
> as simple as that work or what were you thinking?
>
>
>
> > --
> > /tj/
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MzK
>
> "This is no social crisis
>  Just another tricky day for you."
>                 -- "Tricky Day", the Who
>
>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"This is no social crisis
 Just another tricky day for you."
                 -- "Tricky Day", the Who

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message