incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Shahaf <...@daniel.shahaf.name>
Subject Re: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Date Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:48:06 GMT
done

neddamian@comcast.net wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:21:01 +0000:
> I have tried 3 times to get my email removed by sending a message to the autodelete mailbox.
Please rmove mine also. neddamian@comcast.net. 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emanuel Winocur" <2always@cox.net> 
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org 
> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 1:02:13 PM 
> Subject: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS 
> 
> Dear Friends, I am overwhelmed with the quantity of emails send to me by 
> many members. I not longer can deal with this!~! PLEASE DELETE ME FROM THE 
> LIST OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION'S. 
> Emanuel M. Winocur 
> 2always@cox.net 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "André Schnabel" <andre.schnabel@gmx.net> 
> To: <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> 
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:53 AM 
> Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other 
> matters) 
> 
> 
> > Hi Rob, 
> > 
> > Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir: 
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<Andre.Schnabel@gmx.net>

> >> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local 
> >> infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't 
> >> believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP rights for 
> >> collections of facts, i.e., databases. It has been discussed but 
> >> there is no agreement. See the WIPO statement on this: 
> >> 
> >> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/databases.html 
> > 
> > This is not a statement on IP rights for databases - it is a statement on 
> > IP rights for 
> > *Non-Original Databases* . 
> > 
> > We obviously disagree on this part of the text: 
> > " The originality requirement that a database must constitute an 
> > intellectual creation 
> > by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents in order to 
> > enjoy copyright 
> > protection means that some databases are not protected ..." 
> > 
> > So obviously some databases actually are protected. Of course - if you 
> > think, that a 
> > dictionary is just a mere collection of words you would obviously come to 
> > the 
> > conclusion that this is no intellectual creation. 
> > 
> > btw ... if IBM does have dictionaries available, why don't you just 
> > publish those, if 
> > there is no copyright protection in place? Doing so would end this 
> > discussion very 
> > quickly andwould be a great contribution to the project. 
> > 
> > regards, 
> > 
> > André 
> 

Mime
View raw message