incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mathias Bauer <mathias_ba...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Is it time for a build machine?
Date Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:10:49 GMT
As much as I liked the old build bots and used them a lot, the whole setup and their overall
usage was far from what Hudson/Jenkins can deliver.

So I maintain my point that there is nothing we can use and starting with a new setup and
new hardware is better. 

YMMV

Regards,
Mathias

Am 15.11.2011 um 22:12 schrieb Christian Lohmaier <cloph@openoffice.org>:

> Hi *,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Mathias Bauer <Mathias_Bauer@gmx.net> wrote:
>> On 15.11.2011 04:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just wondering,
>>> 
>>> Perhaps the older OOo at SUN/Oracle also had some
>>> setup for hudson/jenkins that we could reuse?
>> 
>> No, unfortunately OOo never embraced continuous integration and all the
>> other wonderful things you can build around it.
> 
> There have been both tinderbox as well as buildbot available and in
> use in the OOo project.
> Tinderbox did keep track of commits, did flag build-results as "dirty"
> when there were commits after the last build started, and thus allowed
> rebuilding when a cws was touched, and (some) buildbots were
> autotriggered by watching the commit-mailinglist, so they as well did
> built whenever the code was changed.
> That the build-results have often been ignored by the corresponding
> developers is a different story. But stating that there was no such
> thing is, well, typical.
> 
> ciao
> Christian

Mime
View raw message