incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Patch]submit a patch to fix the issue - 115580.
Date Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:19:16 GMT
Acknowledged with a +1.

Pedro.

--- On Thu, 11/17/11, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
...
> On 11/17/11 5:41 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> > 2011/11/17 Jürgen Schmidt<jogischmidt@googlemail.com>:
> >> On 11/17/11 4:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Committed as revision 1203218.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you very much for your contribution!
> >>>
> >>
> >> i very much appreciate that we accept and
> integrate everything at the
> >> moment. But should we maybe a little bit more
> careful? And should we focus
> >> more on our main common goal to provide a stable
> version asap?
> >>
> >> I thought we would have agreed to only make the
> code base Apache conform and
> >> work on replacements for license critical things.
> We are now in a phase
> >> where we integrate many patches from Issuezilla
> that are not yet integrated
> >> for specific reasons (maybe not reviewed, not
> complete, too bad etc.). We
> >> integrate things without real testing the changes.
> I am not sure if we
> >> should do that at the moment.
> >>
> >> What do others think about it?
> >>
> >
> > Maybe hold back changes that are not related to IP
> cleanup.  Then,
> > once the IP review is done, then we might branch to
> stabilize the 3.4
> > release and allow other patches to the
> trunk.   Would that work?  I
> > don't think we want to slow down patches for
> long.  That was a
> > criticism of the legacy project.  But for the
> next few weeks we really
> > should concentrate on IP review.
> >
> exactly, i simply wanted to focus on our most important
> goal to provide a stable Apache conform release. And
> every helping hand here is very much appreciated.
> 
> And of course we will be very open for bugfix patches and
> even other contributions that help us to bring the project
> forward.
> 
> Don't get me wrong  here!!!
> 
> It is perfectly ok, if we accept non critical patches that
> help to bring new committers on board ;-)
> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message