Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dwhytock@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksogahQA6FrhBFgBBn5K5ypw+nrQiaypFsXcXaL_yHQ4yGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <00ae01cc8848$0d4bb530$27e31f90$@acm.org>
	<CAP-ksoh_T3uo2gMWkqGwb+fAKiW-geMHX+A_EaXqrCvAjPh+Mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksojrUHLV0rEdURDMphoPORc=kvVQkZ8UJt8bUhvf1MH1Qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFNckhAtnLqPA2PZmZDo_BV0bDkbeqQ-6Uh-a=zS4gcm0kVZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksogahQA6FrhBFgBBn5K5ypw+nrQiaypFsXcXaL_yHQ4yGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:05:44 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAMwm1vG3M1j9OCwmStS3kEoLakZeZjSq_PSM=LUXiNozzs5LYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review of OpenOffice.org Forums Agreement
From: Donald Whytock <dwhytock@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please not, there are not technical volunteers for fulfilling that
>> task. Terry E, who left the project, has mentioned this might be very
>> difficult or even impossible. This is a wish, but there is need of
>> somebody who does it.
>>
>
> But that is what the proposal on the wiki says. =A0The wiki has a
> "technical changes" section in the proposal that states:
>
> "A new public board "site governance" is established to discuss forum
> related tasks. The messages are sent automatically to a readonly
> mailinglist name "forum-sitegovernance@"
>
> A new private board "private xxx" is established to discuss sensitive
> tasks, like for example user behavior. The messages are sent
> automatically to a privately archived mailing list (allowing Apache
> Members and Apache OpenOffice PPMC members to view) with a specific
> tag"
>
> Is this an error? =A0Should that section of the proposal be removed?
>
> If it is removed, then what are we doing about audit trails, and such?
> =A0Does phpBB give us everything we need without having it echoed to a
> private list? =A0I'm fine with that. =A0But I think it is important that
> the proposal cover how the forums will satisfy that important
> requirement.

Many BB systems allow updates to threads to be sent to a participant's
email address.  Perhaps a pseudouser can be set up whose email address
is a private ASF list, so that forum posts are archived there...?

Don