Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A3FC94EA for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57424 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2011 07:01:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57377 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2011 07:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57365 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2011 07:01:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:01:09 +0000 Received: by bkat8 with SMTP id t8so204524bka.6 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CsE1K9L/Z3JA953etQKbJINpDyuu5x3j8nwGISPXmiw=; b=DGQxDx1nZ5Sy1kdMKLiHK/mEnVMegWaEtWDXFsPh6pM025EzVNuZg206mfhQwDzsMg H8hKUwe+w2o3VqJN4Ymrq61Qsjh5U/Qu1APriIhnfvGONvFqnILd0gMgyMFQtq2QHPkV mrmiBJnqmn9J6aeTfuEBhW/OFEogn7pavOT5Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.133.71 with SMTP id e7mr1565236bkt.50.1318489249280; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.141.75 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <008401cc8847$6623a790$326af6b0$@apache.org> References: <008401cc8847$6623a790$326af6b0$@apache.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:00:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review of OpenOffice.org Forums Agreement From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_Schmidt?= To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, orcmid@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174786ac57f3e104af28b3c2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174786ac57f3e104af28b3c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > The Draft Proposal for governance and operation of the OpenOffice.org > Forums > within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling is available on the Apache OO.o > Community Wiki at > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integrate+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project > >. > > The Draft Proposal is the work of the OpenOffice.org Forums operators, with > consultation of Apache contributors. > > It is proposed to discuss this proposal for at least 6 days starting now, > Tuesday 2011-10-11, and ending at midnight Monday, 2011-10-17T24:00Z. > well done proposal and i really appreciated that we continue to move forward in a constructive and promising way. And having the forum under a *.openoffice.org domain is great for our users because that is what they expected (at least form my pov). And the Apache infra structure team can hopefully benefit from the knowledge to run a forum for other Apache projects as well. Wondering why the discussion is on the wiki as comments? Juergen > > Once discussion of the Draft Proposal has quieted by that time or later, > discussion can stop. If it is then evident that a ratifying ballot on > acceptance of the Draft Proposal by the Apache OO.o Podling can be held, a > separate [VOTE] will be initiated on the ooo-dev list for that purpose. > Ratification of the Draft Proposal will establish the commitment of the > Apache > OO.o Podling to implementation of the proposal and honoring its provisions > for > governance of the OpenOffice.org Forums as part of the Apache OO.o Podling. > > GUIDELINES > > The Draft Proposal represents the current thinking of the OpenOffice.org > Forums operators. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THE DRAFT PROPOSAL page. > > Instead, discuss suggestions and modifications on this list and await any > changes to be made as the OpenOffice.org Forum operators choose to offer > improvements in response to the discussion, including based on ooo-dev > suggestions of their own. > > When it is concluded that the Draft Proposal is in a final condition > suitable > for ratification, the OpenOffice.org Forum operators will notify us of > their > readiness (repeatedly if there is still ongoing discussion and > improvement). > > - Dennis > --0015174786ac57f3e104af28b3c2--