Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74E069EC1 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85947 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2011 01:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85883 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2011 01:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85873 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2011 01:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tjfrazier@cfl.rr.com designates 75.180.132.123 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.180.132.123] (HELO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (75.180.132.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:57:32 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=IgpUQdftngPYiFo35C+d15A7VOHB2YsNoON26nFqGQw= c=1 sm=0 a=Ijkj0N75SCkA:10 a=D0TXkX4NJesA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=4Jz+jJ0YjisZbq4FujTDrw==:17 a=pQs5aej7AAAA:8 a=fSiAqA8CpveSZLahW5cA:9 a=QpqXfxrQzWisTqIwFlIA:7 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=4Jz+jJ0YjisZbq4FujTDrw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 68.205.107.180 Received: from [68.205.107.180] ([68.205.107.180:50272] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 1B/AB-12951-6FEACAE4; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:57:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4EACAEEF.7000005@cfl.rr.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:57:03 -0400 From: TJ Frazier Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bugzilla-admin@apache.org CC: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues References: <4EAC565C.8000208@cfl.rr.com> <4EAC899B.3020703@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4EAC899B.3020703@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/29/2011 19:17, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote: >> Hi, Mark, et al., >> >> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came >> in. I would have expected today's date. > > It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next > upgrade. Fine, sorry to bother you with it. Thanks for the link; I'll use it before reporting further problems. > >> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting >> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed. > > I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of > the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to > the move to the ASF. Please see below. > >> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/ > > Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the > reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what > you are trying to achieve. I was thinking that many contributors on the ooo-dev list, since they interact with BZ by filing, examining, and fixing issues, would want to know about BZ problems. I erred in not copying the list on my earlier complaint, which you solved so nicely. The headers I refer to are those on my – and your, not BZ's – emails. Seems to work well. > > Mark > > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910 > -- /tj/