Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B8C9AE2 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22299 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2011 17:59:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22252 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2011 17:59:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22244 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2011 17:59:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of martin.hollmichel@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:59:19 +0000 Received: by eyd9 with SMTP id 9so3152256eyd.6 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/wmm7zaT3wKlfAbyxqZCeUTTX9oEVAd2znk4ja61cQU=; b=wLfTIRi+OxWxYUTDPWTVFRrjok2ad8pOz2oLob7wcdvYYmCTZ7gFwRmOZ8KABt8To4 OMsTxUEBYDG3U/OaROqjgy8YOKnqFMBMCBfAzvosVCAMv0U56CcppbPbnPJWoyNTDpIw X51IZ/OaZM7qUi9U45RoqnObs6CyfGZt8Pj6c= Received: by 10.223.81.205 with SMTP id y13mr25630135fak.34.1318874338232; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.174] (pD951EF8C.dip.t-dialin.net. [217.81.239.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c1sm24661755fab.15.2011.10.17.10.58.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9C6CE1.6010107@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:58:57 +0200 From: Martin Hollmichel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Foundation blog posting on Apache OOo References: <4E9825FA.8060008@shanecurcuru.org> <2A27104D-1713-4B01-92E0-80ABCC9C4410@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <2A27104D-1713-4B01-92E0-80ABCC9C4410@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 14.10.2011 18:22, schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Whereas it is in the self-interest of those entities Hmm, I think it's not that easy. We see Team OpenOffice.org (as the legal entity behind the old Community Council) still in the repsonsibilty of an uncredible amount of users which gave their support in the last decade to OpenOffice.org (the old one). And it was not Team OpenOffice.org acting so that we going to have two forks of the old codebase in the future. We'd look foward to support collaboration and to re-unify forces, so that we come to a stronger product and project than we ever had, but I don't think that it helps to ignore history of OpenOfffice.org completly, Martin (Team OpenOffice.org e.V.)