Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4E9C415C.8040101@shanecurcuru.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:53:16 -0400
From: Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Staged Migration of OO.o domain properties (long)
References: <009001cc8acc$e4b6f9e0$ae24eda0$@acm.org>
 <4E9C3AE1.7000800@shanecurcuru.org>
 <CAMK9kTgK1xj-wC3j9g4jc2uXzpTBXdaqSZ2nAjUkCTbc9HWpRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E9C3F8D.3020905@shanecurcuru.org>
 <CAMK9kTg=et799H9gtg7zqAvo0X9XkoNOi8NVmrtFoJPU5r8DxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMK9kTg=et799H9gtg7zqAvo0X9XkoNOi8NVmrtFoJPU5r8DxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 10/17/2011 10:50 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Shane Curcuru<asf@shanecurcuru.org>  wrote:
>
>> On 10/17/2011 10:32 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Shane Curcuru<asf@shanecurcuru.org>
>>>   wrote:
>>>
>>>   On 10/14/2011 7:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've been pondering what it takes to choreograph migration of the live
>>>>> OpenOffice.org properties into Apache custodianship.
>>>>>
>>>> ...snip...
>>>>
>>>> Great starts all.
>>>>
>>>> Where is the noodling and proposed list of what domains we want to keep
>>>> (i.e. host as *.oo.o to keep links, or host at ooo.a.o/* because it's
>>>> project oriented information) and what ones we're not going to keep?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I would preffer an *.oo.o is easier to manage and recognized, create
>>> shorter
>>> URLs and also reinforce branding.
>>>
>>
>> I would prefer an ooo.a.o, since that reinforces the Apache branding. Note
>> that the primary homepage for the project - at least in terms of anyone
>> interested in participating in the project (i.e. any potential contributors)
>> - will be the ooo.a.o page.
>>
>
> Sorry I got distracted by the question mark and thought you were asking for
> feedback.

No, my fault - I'm talking too much!  We are all looking for feedback on 
what content the PPMC proposes to host where (once migration is complete 
/ in progress).  I'm just trying to point out that there are a some 
restrictions on which content should be hosted at oo.o versus ooo.a.o. 
But the PPMC needs to come up with the plan(s) by discussing it here.

- Shane, off to a meeting and putting the email client down for a bit!