Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11387934E for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82349 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2011 21:58:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82305 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2011 21:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82297 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2011 21:58:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:58:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of florisv59@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:58:36 +0000 Received: by eyd9 with SMTP id 9so99564eyd.6 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:58:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7z56vZi8ldX8ibixsmRzOcpzcHGGNnpjB7ms6KMS6f0=; b=p6Ech0gzTKW7OJSelJOXfu+gGmSJ9NN8eyPFxrB9lqFCDkiu6w6GFBiOxLVpfU2tVG rzaRUuc74qD1c5AhrJbtXllaZ4jqzbRdUxhPEJaP00LkTyKHz071zNKcSGxLfYIEudfP iulhrJ7YfTi6vgXY1pLF3sQf6xIJOfspdC4fs= Received: by 10.14.14.225 with SMTP id d73mr2401491eed.149.1318370296509; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] ([87.208.201.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t14sm73535eeh.7.2011.10.11.14.58.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E94BBF4.6080706@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:58:12 +0200 From: floris v User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review of OpenOffice.org Forums Agreement References: <00ae01cc8848$0d4bb530$27e31f90$@acm.org> <20111011210504.GA22830@daniel3.local> <017101cc885f$30a126c0$91e37440$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <017101cc885f$30a126c0$91e37440$@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Op 11-10-2011 23:46, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef: >> *H.* Should the ASF or the Apache OpenOffice.org project decide to >> terminate its support of the forums, it will grant a period of at >> least 90 days for the transfer of the contents and structure of the >> forums to another host as decided by the Administrators, Moderators >> and Volunteers. > The PPMC is not empowered to agree to a clause that reads, "The ASF will > grant 90 days to someone". Only the board and officers can make > commitments on behalf of the org. > > That's just the legal side of things and is not the same as the question > of whether one should expect the ASF, should any of its entities decide > to take the forums down, provide advance warning or migration codepath. > > The relevant entities in this case include IPMC, Infra, and Board. How exactly should I understand this? Is this meant to be discouraging, like: forum people, you might as well leave right now?