Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CAC57D44 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81715 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 16:55:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81659 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 16:55:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81651 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2011 16:55:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:55:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FROM_12LTRDOM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.208.4.195] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (74.208.4.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:55:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (216-15-112-83.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com [216.15.112.83]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MWCYL-1RbI2A0rF3-00XVRo; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:54:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4E93234B.5070306@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:54:35 -0400 From: Shane Curcuru User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Fixing security lists (was: Vulnerability fixed in LibreOffice) References: <1318241437.13022.82.camel@lenovo-w500> <008001cc875d$c14ab9f0$43e02dd0$@acm.org> <1318261047.9126.56.camel@lenovo-w500> <4E931E44.6010004@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <4E931E44.6010004@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:FWDQSBJ6v8hXp+xj0TwvS3NxgVyDUVvZMdh1/6/ShYf yiOP4K/KEpzq1Gs74/iLPZzEeP0ceV2YZddsSBOCY8/POKTrkS TiMnoDiBx1P6l/kHSTBGqXqZuh6rbA7KHFKa3rkU+jTt6MXbz2 gvDSsw+SyTKOdoLp5sQdISmpFzl906A6QKq6IXDN/6UiwrhyWq iR4FOHpzgkfgH2gtNpdRaPAUWZyxaD6qT/mrDVWYBV0+AbN2xP nebhq2ksUlnL9bTbq0CZyEx4WJmc+FK8QeIjPW4HUoWOvnouJw mj2xvVVeWIgSTBboeZPypj9s8lPOF5k8+54gG5mdSiKEOUHVo2 i/mCA2Oq5On/8tiPmZngZ0tHQWR6M/eifYycEaQCB On 10/10/2011 12:33 PM, Malte Timmermann wrote: ...snip... > - Which leaves us with 1 common list where we don't have such > restrictive rules, and can continue with our cooperation: The > old/original OOo security list securityteam@openoffice.org. ...snip... To ask a practical question: is there anyone reading this email who is able to, and is willing to, manage the subscribers and archives for that list currently? Of not, the PPMC certainly needs to find such person ASAP so we know who's on the list, and so we can archive (privately) any ongoing list traffic someplace that has ASF Member and ooo-security@ oversight of the archive (at minimum, obviously any approved subscribers - from whatever organizatoins - should have some kind of archive access to the list). - Shane