Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B7587CD7 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27690 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2011 20:10:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27648 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2011 20:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27639 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2011 20:10:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:10:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.196] (HELO nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:10:25 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2011 20:10:04 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.60] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2011 20:10:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2011 20:10:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 812075.55720.bm@omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 49277 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Oct 2011 20:10:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1320005404; bh=2wgbR22vIomrXapoINaK0TNwHn5bnTNnDc0XGvJ0FEQ=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oeYt6BliG3Ote/+k1vct4h0peCkIf/D7vKZ1xaomWUZJddseRkE1rx6+zZq0USzSz6lJstHLtupp7guo3RU35ZNGY0vS20OXazmPJWsw1ILVh3Qq7pJT5aZikpYgQjfS1autbneXN3XAodHise8jS98ZyU14WM5cpIAuP/7oJbw= X-YMail-OSG: kQ2EtkEVM1n6TwYT83gCjVimJISnO0oL0o9Ku80d1HtaLab p8el3n57UCqu0K6Zy.yG1dpjoyhjj.RsfR8fzPXQPW4bHEq3d.N.SpQ9TiTs H6TAZ8rnPCNf7BAdgkeyLtdRRhpBIC8I2ZC8GSAHWCzwGueYBlSsZbeaTNat ruGS.owZTub_Fs2nKyREecRurw2ohQA83JD3rfEtRaFLcH_IHEItWfNDIOno S8_T9Ize3KWmLsEPJ9s2WJVCAFASFRSTXybUCB26KGZfifF9VfEeb0UMiZEv QgL4FxWUQAIxSC8E47nFggZFi579QQBvt4777sqbC_unOIXdQ0H.96D2I1Ow aHAQV2dndCE.r982HK7rsbljifKoRD.v375ngapDhZiEqgcgg_sq_fodnqib uvG8kvC.C1BD2j4OSMaid9Jo5w31Pu58mN7G7xOPKCux.ZFELO73nXRyZB_y ZCLAQrVDnScv1l1l1k_oHssYzo25F1bZ0LjJDe9IKOrWwVcG71mHpiXm3TXM wVVhnEILJHC8NjFuswzNo1WBShSOe4.N2GakGHk4JameUi9oAfJeIF4ODuQ9 8hSVQCDZsu4zgW6pD9CI1tSXNu3d5sC7fu1M6vnW0T_hzon3c7Y.bj.3Ub2p 4J99GXSzCekoATso- Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:10:04 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.11 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 Message-ID: <1320005404.48853.YahooMailClassic@web113513.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:10:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Giffuni Reply-To: pfg@apache.org Subject: Re: Ohloh To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A--- On Sun, 10/30/11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:= =0A=0A> Pedro Giffuni wrote:=0A> > I am not sure how Ohloh= works, but I guess the=0A> alternative=0A> > was to leave it pointing to t= he previous Hg server=0A> that=0A> > is abandoned until it dies ... and the= n attribution=0A> > history would still be lost :(.=0A> =0A> Except if some= body would host the readonly, historic=0A> version of the hg repos, right?= =0A> =0A=0AThere is one in bitbucket that I've dubbed the=0Athe "unofficial= OpenOffice.org historic archive".=0A=0AAll my respect to the people that m= ade OpenOffice.org=0Agreat, but again the issue is that I am not sure how= =0AOhloh can point to that archive and not give the=0Aimpression that OpenO= ffice.org is dead.=0A=0AI assume the current Ohloh maintainers did try.=0A= =0APedro.=0A=0A=0A> >=0A> > cheers,=0A> >=0A> > Pedro.=0A> >=0A> > --- On S= un, 10/30/11, Eike Rathke =0A> wrote:=0A> >=0A> >> Hi,=0A> >>= =0A> >> Whoever had the brilliant idea to make Ohloh's=0A> source code=0A> = >> repository entry for OOo https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice=0A> >> point= to the AOOo repository instead trashed over=0A> 10 years=0A> >> worth of 1= 0000s commits of 100s developers.=0A> Congratulations.=0A> >>=0A> >> =A0 Ei= ke=0A> >>=0A> >> --=0A> >> =A0PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in= =0A> all private=0A> >> communication.=0A> >> =A0Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A = 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3=A0=0A> 9E96=0A> >> 2F1A D073 293C 05FD=0A> >>=0A> >=0A>= =0A> =0A> =0A> -- =0A> http://www.grobmeier.de=0A>