Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <1319470762.77097.YahooMailClassic@web113517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Reply-To: pfg@apache.org
Subject: RE: [proposal] development for the first AOO release
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, dennis.hamilton@acm.org
In-Reply-To: <007b01cc925d$7c722150$755663f0$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

BTW,

Its clear to me the final product name is=20

Apache OpenOffice.org

and I already used it in Rev. 1184898.

Pedro.

--- On Mon, 10/24/11, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:

> =A0=A0=A0BTW:
> =A0=A0=A0When we do the rebranding stuff again
> (sick!) we should have a final=20
> =A0=A0=A0product name at hand at that time.
>=20
> I suspect that the restraints on identification of
> incubator releases will apply to however it is branded.
>=20
> It looks like the first one, at least, is definitely a
> "Technology Preview" release.=A0 It and the second will
> certainly be ways to bring the QA, localization, and related
> activities back into action as well.=A0=20
>=20
> Exciting times ahead!
>=20
>=20
>  - Dennis E. Hamilton
> =A0=A0=A0tools for document
> interoperability,=A0 <http://nfoWorks.org/>
> =A0=A0=A0dennis.hamilton@acm.org=A0
> gsm: +1-206-779-9430=A0 @orcmid
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.mail@wtnet.de]
>=20
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 07:34
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [proposal] development for the first AOO
> release
>=20
> Am 10/24/2011 03:18 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose the following development
> milestones on our way
> > to the first AOO release:
> >
> > - "IP cleared" milestone
> [ ... ]
> >
> > - "features back" milestone
> > For this milestone we should work on bringing back the
> features which
> > are lost in the previous milestone. I do not think
> that we have to bring
> > back every feature for a first release. Thus, we would
> have got the
> > possibility to work on the features which are of most
> interest. At some
> > point we could create a "release candidate" and start
> working on
> > stabilizing it for a first release, if we think that
> the "must have"
> > features are back.
>=20
> [ ... ]
> > Any remarks/comments/improvements/adjustments?
> > Any objections to follow such plan for our first
> release?
>=20
> It's fine to see a kind of roadmap starting.
>=20
> Also to have a first public intermediate step with a clean
> IP is great,=20
> towards our first "real" Apache release. Then everybody can
> see that=20
> it's really going forward with OOo (as often the feeling is
> the opposite=20
> in the public when you read news and blogs).
>=20
> And of course we have to make clear that this milestone is
> really just=20
> an intermediate step and not what the most would expect.
>=20
> BTW:
> When we do the rebranding stuff again (sick!) we should
> have a final=20
> product name at hand at that time.
>=20
> Marcus
>=20
> [ ... ]
>=20
>