Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D447694C8 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73847 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2011 13:23:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73798 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2011 13:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73790 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2011 13:23:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:23:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.135.221.2] (HELO nat.nue.novell.com) (195.135.221.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:22:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.6] (mmeeks.gotadsl.co.uk [213.208.123.138]) by nat.nue.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:33 +0200 Subject: Neutral / shared security list ... From: Michael Meeks Reply-To: michael.meeks@suse.com To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:23:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <005801cc87a3$61e5a240$25b0e6c0$@acm.org> References: <1318241437.13022.82.camel@lenovo-w500> <008001cc875d$c14ab9f0$43e02dd0$@acm.org> <1318261047.9126.56.camel@lenovo-w500> <4E931E44.6010004@gmx.com> <1318280051.9126.118.camel@lenovo-w500> <005801cc87a3$61e5a240$25b0e6c0$@acm.org> Organization: Novell, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1319030597.5425.291.camel@lenovo-w500> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, It seems despite the promising flower of agreement here between Dennis and myself; we seem to have failed to attract any volunteers - and an openoffice.org branded list is not a suitably neutral place. Which leaves me to suggest freedesktop again; failing any violent disagreement to the contrary, or any solid reason why a single project should own, claim, brand and/or control such a shared security list, I'll ask to have: officesecurity@lists.freedesktop.org or somesuch created; I suggest a three-way owner / moderator structure with Dennis, Rob and myself providing some spectrum of balance. It would of course help to have the previous subscriber list available to pre-populate it, but that can be inferred from the archives if necessary. Any objections ? All the best, Michael. On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:21 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > +1 .. > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:33 +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote: > > old/original OOo security list securityteam@openoffice.org. > > Which of course is highly sub-optimal, since it is an openoffice.org > branded list, soon to be Apache owned - which is not neutral. Apparently > we can't administer it effectively, and it is hosted on a server which > people have said may have been flaky / dropping mail (also not ideal). > > I would really love someone to volunteer with some > securityteam@largefurryanimal.com style domain, that is sufficiently > neutral (if freedesktop will really not do); and to have a diverse admin > environment too to increase mutual confidence. > > All the best, > > Michael. > -- michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot