Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AE8A7E27 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31951 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2011 19:19:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31902 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2011 19:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31890 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2011 19:19:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.97] (HELO nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:31 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2011 19:19:09 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.22] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2011 19:19:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1022.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Oct 2011 19:19:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 688886.42074.bm@omp1022.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 37739 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Oct 2011 19:19:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1317928749; bh=DDZkW5fDcVh3ch0cWKotndSSYqscFYoCebInBn6D3JM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EAMxYJfysbEARmagEbeakK+cfgujn1ROTkpDdMNuBIi9Ynv/yT6Up2r68+gubB+3v+VVJRmMhoU0gcnyRwNNhxonAvEE7A2ZwzSyZsSSp9t0BZn9FwRLwv0o5u6QxiRF8Tgpi0Nga8dPsYIdUtUltFMTxOQfie7dQQl9ySDZt+M= X-YMail-OSG: sk7MIk4VM1l5v8I23zqxXJ4ueqf7SKUYJJxThGHss92fQJ0 8u0_fCmVyGsGtK5khNjU.c_P.2eDluOY_TjXTJREQRZP5f0ispo6P014i1z6 OhuIQlLlAoZgfACWU4ARR1Quk.WNXsUacrh.IQFipAbhnD21oZHMF04JzrgO EwZsz0uuGaFG.2056XxJ9rRWCQ87CfAQ.PWfsJ16i0i8aCNVAGAuBpkgUHPK 2WphTVI8n2gemGgNZ_Qig3Sbc_eoV54xQD6X1E1M6316JGzfFcQ2IuNyo7QF wbv9X7GSsfJhij1Yyyfi5mNMkLMk819cR9WVEZFK5QxLbDWkANLIlQb10sPv gLi9BONiUy2Rrct_tmIU1pCPNboN..Cnqj_GcYNbNwFkSnB.Z1sllrWzP3M. uEcuLm2Ardi1vcfqVTiY13P983kAo0sOaQGM86PhJXUJRobfJB3WE1bGDeJw BiZlk_5tvd8dumgfmz8GajjErWRM1H5QeROhZUyhHp01F3wYolhXukw050CB Gn2iriiSCtqm45cWV9sjInVhfxA6NKzF4QztOg6huFW.YUVZCXQva2qh1CrM 8K5U3wgpxc8NMMNexrRzYJQh5VO6S9wdhLvVfPZrc8UB6K5wyz01P5VXlQFl y2jSo1Gn5UNKnPEr5D7glpAW7aT_dspM- Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:19:09 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 Message-ID: <1317928749.71326.YahooMailClassic@web113506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:19:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Giffuni Reply-To: pfg@apache.org Subject: Re: [CODE] Linux build break: GPERF unset (rev. 1179044) To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20111006182824.GA16733@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --- On Thu, 10/6/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:=0A...=0A> =0A> GPERF is n= ot exported due to changes in=0A> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/oo= o/trunk/main/set_soenv.in?r1=3D1174172&r2=3D1179044&pathrev=3D1179044&diff_= format=3Dh=0A> =0A=0AThat would be me indeed :(. Do you guys have pointyhat= s for=0Apeople that break builds?=0A=0A=0A> I added linux to the platform t= est to keep build=0A> =0A> =A0=A0=A0if ($platform =3D~=0A> m/solaris|darwin= |freebsd|linux/)=0A> =0A> but I guess this will break on other platforms to= o.=0A> I don't get why it was moved inside the if.=0A> =0A=0AI was only con= sistent with the comment. I committed a=0Aworkaround in revision 1179774 bu= t I will look for a=0Abetter solution soon.=0A=0AThanks for the report and = sorry for the inconvenience.=0A=0APedro.=0A