incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <>
Subject Re: License implications of build-time or test-time dependencies?
Date Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:37:01 GMT
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby <> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni <> wrote:
>> Hmm ...
>> We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not drawn
a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think we will have to open BZ issues
for those.
>> The gtk/qt issue is rather critcal: I do not think there is previous history among
Apache projects depending on them but if we cannot consider those "system provided" libraries
it would be a serious setback to an early Apache release.
> I would support allowing C/C++ code to link to gtk and/or qt, provided
> we don't distribute gtk or qt themselves.  Both are LGPL.  The LGPL is
> clear for languages like C, C++.

Clear in what sense?  Dynamic linking and such?

>> Pedro.

View raw message