incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Lynch <ianrly...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: License implications of build-time or test-time dependencies?
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:07:14 GMT
On 21 October 2011 16:01, Herbert Dürr <hdu@apache.org> wrote:

> On 2011/10/20 11:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rob Weir<robweir@apache.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni<pfg@apache.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmm ...
>>>>> We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have
>>>>> not drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think
we
>>>>> will have to open BZ issues for those.
>>>>>
>>>>> The gtk/qt issue is rather critcal: I do not think there is previous
>>>>> history among Apache projects depending on them but if we cannot consider
>>>>> those "system provided" libraries it would be a serious setback to an
early
>>>>> Apache release.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would support allowing C/C++ code to link to gtk and/or qt, provided
>>>> we don't distribute gtk or qt themselves.  Both are LGPL.  The LGPL is
>>>> clear for languages like C, C++.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Clear in what sense?  Dynamic linking and such?
>>>
>>
>> Excellent question.  The definition of 'link' is well understood in
>> the context of C/C++.  That's all I meant to say.
>>
>> I'll go further and state that what I said I would support is
>> intentionally limited in scope to only gtk and qt.  Both are commonly
>> distributed with Linux distributions.  Other candidate LGPL licensed
>> dependencies would have to be evaluated separately.
>>
>
> Who does the evaluation? The PPMC members of the AOOo project?
>
> The next LGPL library that should be evaluated in that context is CUPS (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**CUPS <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUPS>)
> which is quite essential for printing on many Unix platforms.
>
> Herbert
>

I don't want to sound too negative, but if the whole of CUPS and all its
printer definition files have to be re-written (and that is only one
dependency) isn't saying an Apache licensed release in early new year a bit
optimistic?

-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message