incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wolf Halton <wolf.hal...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
Date Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:33:59 GMT
+1

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Gavin McDonald <gavin@16degrees.com.au>wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 8:17 AM
> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gavin McDonald
> > <gavin@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 2:52 AM
> > >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> > >> <orcmid@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > In reply to this message on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, vote for
> > >> > the acceptance of the proposal for governance and operation of the
> > >> > OpenOffice.org Forums within the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling.
> > >> > The Proposal text is at the October 12 version of wiki page
> > >> >
> > >>
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Changes+integra
> > >> t
> > >> e+the+forums+into+the+AOOo+project>.
> > >> >
> > >> > The balloting will end midnight Friday, 2011-10-21T24:00Z, over 72
> > >> > hours from now.
> > >> >
> > >> > A majority of approvals over disapprovals constitutes acceptance of
> > >> > the proposal.
> > >> >
> > >> > [  ] +1 approve
> > >> > [  ]  0 abstain
> > >> > [  ] -1 disapprove, for the following reasons:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> +0, which does not means "abstain" but means I have no objections,
> > >> +but
> > >> do not volunteer to help with the migration.
> > >
> > > It means abstain if the vote says so. Nobody is volunteering to do
> > > anything when they vote, they are approving, or not, or no opinion.
> > > All those people giving their +1 are not also offering to help with
> > > the migration, but saying with a positive vote that it should happen.
> > > Stop being so obtuse please and go with the flow a bit more to let
> > > things happen. Guidance is appreciated I'm sure, but don't throttle.
> > >
> >
> > The attentive reader would note that I did not vote "0".  I voted "+0".
>  My
> > vote means exactly what I say it means, nothing more, nothing less.
>
> I read exactly what you wrote, do not think I am not attentive.
>
> Your arrogance around here lately is beyond belief, pack it in
>
>
>
>
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> > > Gav...
> > >
> > >>
> > >> -Rob
> > >>
> > >> > GUIDELINES
> > >> >
> > >> > ANYONE MAY VOTE.  BINDING VOTES for determining the outcome are
> > >> those
> > >> > cast by any of the 54 PPMC members (to be listed in a separate
> > >> > message).  When the same individual casts more than one vote, the
> > >> > last-dated vote during the ballot period is taken as the final vote
> > >> > from that individual.  Votes made anywhere but as replies to the
> > >> > ooo-dev
> > >> list with this subject are not counted.
> > >> >
> > >> > DO NOT DISCUSS THE VOTING ON THIS THREAD.  This thread is for the
> > >> > votes themselves, including explanations for -1 votes.  Any other
> > >> > discussion related to this ballot, including discussions with
> > >> > anyone about their vote, should be on a separate threat with
> > >> > subject beginning
> > >> [VOTE][DISCUSS].
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >  - Dennis E. Hamilton
> > >> >   tools for document interoperability,  <http://nfoWorks.org/>
> > >> >   dennis.hamilton@acm.org  gsm: +1-206-779-9430  @orcmid
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >
> > >
>
>


-- 
This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message