incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: Migration Status Page
Date Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:02:03 GMT
Am 10/24/2011 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.mail@wtnet.de>  wrote:
>> Am 10/24/2011 12:22 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>
>>> It could be quite useful, but only if we can keep it up-to-date.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> I've updated some parts and add a bit color to the status column. I hope you
>> like it as it increases the overview even a bit more.
>>
>
> Thanks Marcus (and Gavin and T.J. as well) for the additional details.
>   I'll add a link to this page from our homepage.
>
> Btw, as I had imagined it, the columns would be used like this:
>
> 1) Plan summarizes what we plan to do with that service.  Rehost at
> Apache?  Migrate to different server software?  Abandon?  Unknown
> (which is the same as abandon)?

For me "unknow" is a neutral status. Not pro but also not contra at this 
time. Maybe there is too less information to decide or it wasn't yet 
decided what to do.


> 2) Status is the status of where we are in that plan.  Not the uptime
> status of the server at the moment. But where are we in the plan? Is
> the plan already done? (Like Bugzilla) Or is it happening now?  Or is
> it in the future?

IMHO just write a short sentence and use a respective color. Then the 
status should be clear.

Marcus


Mime
View raw message