incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject RE: [proposal] development for the first AOO release
Date Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:39:22 GMT
BTW,

Its clear to me the final product name is 

Apache OpenOffice.org

and I already used it in Rev. 1184898.

Pedro.

--- On Mon, 10/24/11, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:

>    BTW:
>    When we do the rebranding stuff again
> (sick!) we should have a final 
>    product name at hand at that time.
> 
> I suspect that the restraints on identification of
> incubator releases will apply to however it is branded.
> 
> It looks like the first one, at least, is definitely a
> "Technology Preview" release.  It and the second will
> certainly be ways to bring the QA, localization, and related
> activities back into action as well.  
> 
> Exciting times ahead!
> 
> 
>  - Dennis E. Hamilton
>    tools for document
> interoperability,  <http://nfoWorks.org/>
>    dennis.hamilton@acm.org 
> gsm: +1-206-779-9430  @orcmid
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.mail@wtnet.de]
> 
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 07:34
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [proposal] development for the first AOO
> release
> 
> Am 10/24/2011 03:18 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose the following development
> milestones on our way
> > to the first AOO release:
> >
> > - "IP cleared" milestone
> [ ... ]
> >
> > - "features back" milestone
> > For this milestone we should work on bringing back the
> features which
> > are lost in the previous milestone. I do not think
> that we have to bring
> > back every feature for a first release. Thus, we would
> have got the
> > possibility to work on the features which are of most
> interest. At some
> > point we could create a "release candidate" and start
> working on
> > stabilizing it for a first release, if we think that
> the "must have"
> > features are back.
> 
> [ ... ]
> > Any remarks/comments/improvements/adjustments?
> > Any objections to follow such plan for our first
> release?
> 
> It's fine to see a kind of roadmap starting.
> 
> Also to have a first public intermediate step with a clean
> IP is great, 
> towards our first "real" Apache release. Then everybody can
> see that 
> it's really going forward with OOo (as often the feeling is
> the opposite 
> in the public when you read news and blogs).
> 
> And of course we have to make clear that this milestone is
> really just 
> an intermediate step and not what the most would expect.
> 
> BTW:
> When we do the rebranding stuff again (sick!) we should
> have a final 
> product name at hand at that time.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message