incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sally Khudairi ...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Foundation blog posting on Apache OOo
Date Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:55:18 GMT
Fantastic news! Thanks for seeing this through, Simon.
 
Go Apache!

-Sally



>________________________________
>From: Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com>
>To: Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com>
>Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; "press@apache.org Publicity" <press@apache.org>
>Sent: Saturday, 15 October 2011, 11:36
>Subject: Re: Foundation blog posting on Apache OOo
>
>
>I just passed on your words here to the conference attendees in the closing address and
the audience responded with spontaneous applause.
>Regards,
>S.
>--
>Simon Phipps
>{Terse? Mobile!}
>On Oct 14, 2011 7:28 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
>My only wish is that we had someone at the conference who
>>was supportive of the ASF and the AOOo podling in this
>>matter who was able to explain this in a positive light…
>>I've encouraged Charles Schulz of the TDF to reach out to
>>me, directly, should that not be clear and to emphasize
>>both the ASF's true joy in the success that they have achieved
>>with LO as well as our continued, fervent hope of deep,
>>valuable collaboration to the betterment of the entire
>>OpenOffice ecosystem (as well to all other OpenOffice ecosystem
>>entities!)
>>
>>On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2011 7:12 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The intent is address anyone and everyone who is creating the FUD.
>>>>
>>>> Was the Team OpenOffice PR the straw the broke the camel's back?
>>>> Pretty much, yeah. Are they the only "guilty" party? Hardly.
>>>> Are we pointing fingers at who are? Nope, they know who they are
>>>> themselves without us doing it for them.
>>>
>>> If that is the message you want passed on, so be it.
>>>
>>> S.
>>
>>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message