incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Fix for #118485#, #108221#, #67705#
Date Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:47:56 GMT
Hi;

--- On Wed, 10/12/11, Armin Le Grand <Armin.Le.Grand@me.com> wrote:

>     Hi Pedro,
> 
> On 12.10.2011 03:43, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I committed it as revision 1182166, and noted it in
> > the bug report, but I admit the patch was too big to do
> > a review on it.
> 
> Thanks for comitting. I think - as i wrote - for someone
> knowing the  core it would have been possible to read the
> diffs. This is not too big from my POV, I have bigger
> changes in the pipeline.
>

Oh yes, it was not that big, but it touched a lot of files
which made it difficult to get the context. In any case
big patches are sometimes necessary and I was confident
this wouldn't go bad: it was my way of saying "this guy
should be a committer so he can fix the stuff he breaks"
:),
 
Another thing is that we should be focusing on removing
copyleft components and perhaps some cleanups before
doing enhancements. I specifically want to avoid the
situation in LO where the code and the configuration
options keep growing and growing without control to
the point where patches occasionally make gcc run
out of memory.

I am very likely to commit stuff in these lines if I
get good patches:

- Removal of libegg.
- Use of OpenSSL instead of nss for AES encryption.
- replacement of glibc (already discussed in the list)
- Updates to the scanner (sane and twain) headers.
- Updating ICC.
- Bring back Xalan.
- Replace Rhino with V8 !

And the list will probably grow as ideas keep coming in ;-)

Pedro.

Mime
View raw message