incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
Subject RE: Migration Status Page
Date Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:39:18 GMT
Also, there is clean-up needed on the AOOo bugzilla instance.  Is there a place for issues
about that?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 14:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Migration Status Page

Um, I think there is a lot of how to submit a bug, how to find bugzilla information on OO.o
that will need to be cleaned up still.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.mail@wtnet.de] 
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 13:54
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Migration Status Page

Am 10/24/2011 10:42 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.mail@wtnet.de>  wrote:
>> Am 10/24/2011 07:39 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think that we should update URL column with changed URLs when
>>> appropriate.
>>>
>>> The new URL could be placed two rows below the old URL. It some cases this
>>> will be an interim URL. One example is:
>>
>> Good idea. I've changed it in this way.
>>
>
> I like it.
>
> I also added Bugzilla and SVN.  Although these have already been
> migrated, weeks ago, it is good to give the visitor this information.

And for us to see that at least something is green and done. ;-)

Marcus



>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:16 AM, drew wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 12:55 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Rory O'Farrell<ofarrwrk@iol.ie>
>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:34:27 -0400
>>>>>> Rob Weir<robweir@apache.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, as I had imagined it, the columns would be used like this:
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unknown (which is the same as abandon)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suggest unknown should mean "not yet decided"; admittedly, if
>>>>>> it is difficult to decide, "abandon" is probably a very strong
>>>>>> option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My point is that abandonment does not require an explicit decision by
>>>>> this project.  It is what will happen by default if there is no
>>>>> proactive effort for a given service.
>>>>
>>>> Good point
>>>
>>> I've been told that backups of everything exist and can be accessed by
>>> contacting Andrew Rist.
>>>
>>> I've updated the website, extensions and templates rows.
>>>
>>> I reported the current outage with extension and templates. There is a
>>> link on the migration page.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Installed OO.o (the last 3.4 binary from OO.o) to a fresh machine and
>>>> three things that perhaps should be on the migration page
>>>>
>>>> - Asked me to register
>>>> - Asked if I wanted to check for updates
>>>> - Asked on second start if I wanted opt in to usage information tracking
>>>>
>>>> so should those go onto that page, [likely I missed the discussion, so
>>>> sorry if this has been covered already] if so I can add them.
>>>
>>> Sure, what are the service urls? What is the consequence to a user if
>>> these are not accessible?
>>>
>>> (I've already seen plenty of reports on the users MLs that update checking
>>> has been known to fail for quite awhile.)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> //drew


Mime
View raw message