incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
Subject RE: [PATCH] Fix for #118485#, #108221#, #67705#
Date Mon, 17 Oct 2011 02:03:37 GMT
Regina,

That looks good.  Is the <draw:ole-object> the only child of the <draw:frame>?

I'm asking because I wonder what is needed in the ODF specification with 
regard to <draw:frame> attributes when there are alternative images among the 
<draw:frame> children.  E.g., if there were a <draw:ole-object> and a 
<draw:image> there together.

(I also see that cropping doesn't seem to be handled very easily.)

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Regina Henschel [mailto:rb.henschel@t-online.de]
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 14:42
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for #118485#, #108221#, #67705#

Hi Dennis,

Dennis E. Hamilton schrieb:
> While attention is on the topic of rendering control for OLE objects,
> I have questions:
>
> How does this modification show up in the ODF XML surrounding the
> OLE object (element<draw:ole-object>)?

When I test it with a file, where the OLE-object is already inserted,
then I see, that the transformation is done in the parent element
<draw:frame> with the draw:transform attribute.

Kind regards
Regina

Mime
View raw message