Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40AB575F2 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60186 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2011 15:50:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 60142 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2011 15:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 60133 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2011 15:50:37 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-dy0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:50:36 +0000 Received: by dyk17 with SMTP id 17so13373dyk.6 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.75.136 with SMTP id c8mr872985vdw.316.1316533834501; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.97.144 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E788841.5030308@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:50:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A systematic approach to IP review? From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2011/9/20 J=C3=BCrgen Schmidt : > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Shane Curcuru wro= te: > >> So... has anyone actually run Apache RAT yet? =C2=A0It has a scan only m= ode >> which I'd think would be the simplest place to start. >> >> it's on my todo list to take a look on it, probably i will come back wit= h > questions > I did a run earlier today. Good news is we have 4 files with Apache license. Bad news is we have 52,876 files with "unknown" license. In most cases that should just be the standard OOo header. These scans will be much more useful after we've replaced the OOo headers with Apache headers. But we can't just do a global change. We should only make that change for files that are in the official Oracle SGA. After that is done, then the RAT report will be more useful. > Juergen > > >> Personally, I'd recommend working on basic RAT scans, with the scripts t= o >> run them and any exception rules (for known files, etc.) all checked int= o >> SVN with the build tools for the code. =C2=A0But hey, it's easy for me t= o suggest >> "we" do stuff, when I only currently have time to be a mentor and thus c= an >> get away with just making suggestions. =C2=A08-) >> >> I like the general concept of storing the IP type for files in SVN >> properties; although properties are easy to change, Apache does have a >> strong history of being able to provide oversight for commit logs throug= hout >> a project's history. >> >> - Shane >> >