Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 461EE76BD for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67261 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2011 17:28:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67196 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2011 17:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67186 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2011 17:28:13 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:28:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:28:13 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so1615902vwe.6 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:28:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.75.168 with SMTP id d8mr11974934vdw.421.1317403692618; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.161.20 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:28:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <00cf01cc7f0d$90fec5a0$b2fc50e0$@apache.org> <207D9978-C34F-4358-9801-92115CE75C1C@webmink.com> <5845FF88-D7F6-4DCE-9F44-B6E1136AB9ED@webmink.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:28:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Having New Committers also be on the PPMC From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wro= te: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> BTW, LO/TDF has a steering committee of what? =C2=A013 people total? =C2= =A0Have >> you recommending to them that they put their entire elected membership >> into a "flat" leadership structure? =C2=A0Or is that wisdom, by your gra= ce, >> reserved for us alone? > > Rob, you are comparing Apple and Oranges. The Steering Committee, soon > to be BoD, is not similar to a =C2=A0PMC. It is similar, in function, to > the Apache Board. > OK. I'll give you an apple then. Who approves your releases? The Engineering Steering Committee? How many members are there? Who approves Engineering Steering Committee members? Add those two committees together and what do you get? Anything close to 72 members? -Rob > Norbert >