Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33AAE8FF8 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16368 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2011 02:04:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16220 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2011 02:04:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16212 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2011 02:04:48 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:04:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ew0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:04:48 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2962577ewy.6 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:04:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.16.86 with SMTP id g62mr2126351eeg.128.1315361086654; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.188.15 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:04:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E66CB1E.4070904@pitonyak.org> References: <4E6361AE.3070907@ellisons.org.uk> <4E638AE4.9080003@hdsnet.hu> <4E639792.8020909@ellisons.org.uk> <4E63AD2C.1040401@ellisons.org.uk> <4E63B693.1080509@ellisons.org.uk> <4E66CB1E.4070904@pitonyak.org> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:04:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > > > On 09/04/2011 02:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Terry Ellison >> =C2=A0wrote: >>> >>> On 04/09/11 18:01, Rob Weir wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Terry Ellison >>>> =C2=A0wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 04/09/11 17:22, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> If you do not own the hardware, the domain name and the trademark, >> then you are operating at the pleasure of those who do own these >> things. =C2=A0That might feel like autonomy, but that is illusory. =C2= =A0If you >> want to see what autonomy looks like, look at http://www.oooforum.org/ > > where sadly nothing happens for years until the one person able to do > anything significant finally decides to make a change..... =C2=A0I see, > therefore, far more spam and other things there than at the user forum. > =C2=A0Yet, years later, nothing has been done to improve things. > It looks like a very active forum, with many users and volunteers answering questions. And strangely I see Terry has an account there, with 554 posts: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/profile.phtml?mode=3Dviewprofile&u=3D30585 Hagar has 5,171 posts there: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/profile.phtml?mode=3Dviewprofile&u=3D24243 And even you have 3,512 posts there: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/profile.phtml?mode=3Dviewprofile&u=3D3905 It couldn't have been all that bad if you spent so much time volunteering on those boards. -Rob