Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A977B78B8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54573 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2011 23:20:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54520 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2011 23:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54511 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2011 23:20:57 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:20:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:20:57 +0000 Received: by vwe42 with SMTP id 42so5401160vwe.6 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:20:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.21.10 with SMTP id r10mr6450742vde.287.1317079255933; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.94.69 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:20:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1316912191.17517.YahooMailClassic@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <1316912191.17517.YahooMailClassic@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:20:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ooo-myspell at apache-extras.org From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wr= ote: > > --- On Sat, 9/24/11, Rob Weir wrote: > ... >> >> HunSpell code is tri-licensed under GPL/LGPL/MPL. >> > > That particular licensing scheme is rather weird: LGPL > implies that it can become GPL so you could just say > dual licensed LGPL/MPL, and then, once you make something > pluggable, the GPL basically becomes unenforceable but > let's not get into that right now ;). > > >> If I understand corectly, Apache considers MPL 1.1 to be >> "weak copyleft" and we have some limited ways (as a >> binary of using it in our releases. >> > > Yes we can. I am not sure what a company would think about > it though: some lawyers are more strict than others. What > does IBM use in Lotus Symphony? > We use an library from our LanguageWare project. It is not open source, unfortunately. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/globalization/topics/languageware/ >> >> Individual dictionaries, however, can have their own >> license as you know.=C2=A0 So there may be some that we cannot >> include in the release, but we can still point the user to. >> > > It looks like we might have a bunch of them that we can > relicense to AL2. We will have to wait for the SGA to know > for sure but if it does happen, it is a nice treasure that > we should take advantage of. > > Pedro. >