Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 388477621 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81437 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2011 12:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81382 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2011 12:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81371 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2011 12:05:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:05:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ianrlynch@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:05:40 +0000 Received: by fxi1 with SMTP id 1so498488fxi.6 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:05:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uO6mKD09fPVS/hadyGNRGKrOT0HRhgIwacabVCPupOM=; b=uoKttu7dgxJO7ciwWrnx9EDfyLr6teDxQ+YjR3X4TXcpTubOJDif/eIW4KzF0mXJaw EN5AJlrEnePukvF65+AGv8SCQtRPsJBAuieUp5+o7veN6557u6qcZSOcYCWHDucGOzKR yfSsRuxjO1bmjNV1Hsw0ofzjs3XtTGjvEqIRQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.57.84 with SMTP id b20mr14138648fah.89.1317211517716; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.11 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:05:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1317210530.1961.84.camel@sybil> References: <20110928105334.GC5806@thinkpad.thebehrens.net> <1317210530.1961.84.camel@sybil> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:05:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Not new but under a new hat From: Ian Lynch To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174791349b8a1604adff3418 --0015174791349b8a1604adff3418 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > or why not just shake hands and part as friends. > Of course we can but that makes inefficient use of the resources and is less good for Open Source in general. Fine strategy if we had thousands of developers in each project and a MS size budget. > > Two projects and two applications. > > - if AOO wants to get on desktops they need to produce an application > that better addresses the needs of their target user base then LibO > Given the number of full time developers now at AOO it is really just a matter of time to get a good desktop product out. Whether it is better or not than the LibO version will always be debateable. (I suspect for most users it will never be more than a marginal decision since most don't use most of what is there now). Rather than taking the competitive option why not the cooperative? The real competition is MS Office and there are already other open source office suites such as Koffice to provide some diversity. - if LibO wants desktops they need to better addresses the needs of > their target user base then AOO. > Of course on that logic why not fork every FOSS project to increase competition in the market? -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ) www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. --0015174791349b8a1604adff3418--