Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D6B77C8B for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83620 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2011 15:55:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83574 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2011 15:55:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83566 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2011 15:55:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:55:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tlillqvist@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:55:52 +0000 Received: by iadx2 with SMTP id x2so7875097iad.6 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:55:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=AiZnwJMELAoOEKN3wkitDdxEmk26mhOuyg17YUh3WLo=; b=Nk3mZc2EV7bm+YQProZpb1d118ogKHWRylmrPFI0UAMVf/DPQ35/P+ECMTozYclh+w tfOAW5+45DNmjndrzltf8zon5X7tDZcgF08YfeY093iiLKTltYT7ywux5SpIqVKzZq5Z G3MupWLeZZoi7Hyd8ZH+p6C7f4L8YrABmI6aE= Received: by 10.231.63.9 with SMTP id z9mr12807686ibh.17.1317225331216; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:55:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tlillqvist@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.31.65 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110928105334.GC5806@thinkpad.thebehrens.net> <1317210530.1961.84.camel@sybil> <1317213094.1961.95.camel@sybil> From: Tor Lillqvist Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:55:11 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RYO32kiiXfCm8FrAULhBi7TaC00 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Not new but under a new hat To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >>I come back to the point that if division is intrinsically good, why not >>fork Inkscape, Audacity, Gimp, etc etc. GIMP has been forked for quite some time... Read up on the history of CinePaint (formerly known as "Film GIMP") and its disagreements with GIMP. Here the reasons for the fork were mostly technical disagreements, but sure, these were about policy issues like in what way the project should evolve, "quick and dirty" (then surprisingly followed by "let's change the toolkit used") or "slowly but steadily towards perfection". Or something like that, but I am not neutral and should probably not say more... (I am in the GIMP camp). --tml