Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49DF797ED for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19430 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2011 17:55:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19381 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2011 17:55:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19371 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2011 17:55:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:55:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:55:32 +0000 Received: by wwf10 with SMTP id 10so3408533wwf.0 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendirective.com; s=opendirective; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xca+YQRA3cWAtKt1gDFed1QLJUsIOqxw2qj+ANQnUS8=; b=UrRnqbLwOxR9DY8jORiqwVOSH/rvjC9IvI5Ry5ofHxruJ9MQV2KHdUKAYjfUMcXVX+ TzYtdZjbQzs1deUE+SxUiK0v/OuYhScwgdqyXD4DSPbo0UpVQBlRpTMGhivLSCBKmJRl nTxrSv75w8uu0I8zBPU8NL8pHxkQrS6v+zy8M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.7.94 with SMTP id c30mr526253wbc.44.1317318912248; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.87.137 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [86.158.97.151] Received: by 10.180.87.137 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:55:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re:How do we want to announce new Committers/PPMC members From: Ross Gardler To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215b0301ad20d8904ae183580 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --002215b0301ad20d8904ae183580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Sep 29, 2011 6:01 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: > > A recent press article suggested that this project had not had any new > committers since the project started. This is false. But it would be > hard to tell that, looking at our mailing list or website. > > So far we've been quiet about new committers. We have the votes, > process the paper work, etc., on the ooo-private list. > > Some Apache projects announce each new committer to their main mailing > list. Others don't. We're received mixed advice from our mentors. Really? I've not seen anyone say don't announce committers. The ASF is all about merit, why would one not give credit where credit is due? I know of no projects that do not announce new commiters. . > > Personally, I'm in favor of a modest announcement to the ooo-dev list > after a new committer has been elected and have submitted the iCLA. > > What do you think? +1 Ross > > -Rob On Sep 29, 2011 6:01 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote: --002215b0301ad20d8904ae183580--