Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKQbXgCk_tvAmiFw_LL0rUYSkfJKh7Jb3pu7c7Qy-LAFBodD9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <00cf01cc7f0d$90fec5a0$b2fc50e0$@apache.org>
	<CAP-ksojwgoRfWCJR7UvKLpgXBan230Fb7K1QMpyBQuKT-u-_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<F5E65644-1A36-4204-A1E8-4600F9B394EE@webmink.com>
	<CAP-ksojKHRLcL+cZNNiTL=MWeUdWoaddCbYFGX64o4=sDBqH+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<207D9978-C34F-4358-9801-92115CE75C1C@webmink.com>
	<CAP-ksohNqHzQSETi9fiTe2c__V-zRYMCFrgW6aFaCoBGNymiKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<480AF15F-F4E6-4611-AFB9-7E103D0A64A9@comcast.net>
	<CAKQbXgCk_tvAmiFw_LL0rUYSkfJKh7Jb3pu7c7Qy-LAFBodD9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:20:09 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAKQbXgA8y+CuzS0sv27nyAd0U6axtP5Yp6z3HkRPk3WMWvC+yA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Having New Committers also be on the PPMC
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 30 September 2011 16:48, Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com> wrote=
:
> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> On Sep 30, 2011 4:35 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>
> ...
>
>>
>> I see no reason to stop offering PPMC membership with Committer status. =
If
>> the person chooses not to be on the PPMC that is fine.
>>
>> It is not that I don't think this topic is important, but I think a more
>> important discussion is what parts of the project might require direct P=
PMC
>> member involvement as opposed to merely questioning and having appropria=
te
>> transparency into all parts to provide oversight. Do we need a PPMC memb=
er
>> directly administrating forums and wikis? Do we need the PPMC to provide=
 a
>> generally "Lazy Consensus" approval of committers and other contributors
>> filling roles within the Forum or Wiki administration? Should the PPMC
>> require certain parts of the community to report status periodically?
>>
>
> From a purely ASF point of view there are very few things that require PM=
C
> oversight. the following are the only ones that jump to mind:
>
> - release votes (which equates to IP=A0 due diligence)
> - new committers/PMC members

One more:

- board reports

Ross