Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BB789126 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34830 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2011 09:49:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34791 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2011 09:49:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34783 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2011 09:49:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:49:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of florisv59@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:49:41 +0000 Received: by eya25 with SMTP id 25so2833312eya.6 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 02:49:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BKM29H8g1/Lo8xmyfIZqTYfN8PzZx9ZM756qFutXidc=; b=xIsfVKpVAGePXrp5jNepwBBGWeD1HbsYLYUWBhtB/sQXJ/wSnMMHWQMIs78A7huGEb MCNKG5nKhhhnzbIkfyRycREOSGM+SullSV8+hwauQsD5vhcZuEmgBnHgI2XAonxwt+dK wYw0Blel0GpcrgZZhQVqnkj2g5jMpA0fc/X44= Received: by 10.213.15.204 with SMTP id l12mr21578eba.36.1316771360124; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 02:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (ip94-201-208-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl. [87.208.201.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z54sm32444780eef.2.2011.09.23.02.49.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 02:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E7C561B.30408@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:49:15 +0200 From: floris v User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: consolidation of Windows Build software requirements References: <4E786A57.1090603@googlemail.com> <4E79B767.5080506@googlemail.com> <4E7B9C07.1030908@gmx.net> <4E7C3B8D.4000503@googlemail.com> <4E025E28.1040906@khmeros.info> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Op 23-9-2011 11:39, Tor Lillqvist schreef: >> Sp2is still widely used and installed in low specs computers in developing >> countries where no licensed copies of MS exist (and where the use of >> unlicensed copies of software is not illegal). These computers are a part of >> OOo's market. > Sorry if I am missing something, but why wouldn't these people use an > unlicensed copy (cracked if necessary) of the "real thing", i.e. MS > Office, then, if it is not illegal? > > Imagine trying to convince them to use OOo: "OK, I see you are using > an unlicensed copy of Windows, oh well, that is legal in your country, > and MS is evil anyway, so I don't mind. Now, look at what I have here, > lovely office software which is almost as good as MS Office, and it > doesn't cost anything! And it is Open Source! Don't you want to use > it, please? Please?" > > --tml Win XP is also still widely used by people who post in the Dutch nl community forum to report problems with installing the latest version of OOo. I doubt very much that those people post from a developing country. Then again, those people will have a fully upgraded system with SP3, yes, that's the latest. Peter aka floris v