Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D55278DF for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18595 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2011 08:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18313 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2011 08:37:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18278 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2011 08:37:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:37:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [92.249.128.185] (HELO relay03.digicable.hu) (92.249.128.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:37:42 +0000 Received: from [178.164.177.90] (helo=[192.168.0.101]) by relay03.digicable.hu with esmtpa id 1R1a6s-0001Fr-1u for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:37:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4E687EB9.1070206@hdsnet.hu> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:37:13 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Reizinger_Zolt=E1n?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Bug reporting, handling rules Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original: 178.164.177.90 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, Start again, the my earlier try was alienated. As a first builds starts, and OOo Bugzilla migrated to Apache, needs to think about how we will use it. On OOo QA site can be found three page which says about issues/bug issuing "rules" which the OOo project followed, and Bugzilla was customized accordingly: http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/bug_writing_guidelines.html http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/basic_rules.html This time the bugzilla migrated, could stick to these rules, which worked in most cases. We want to change it? It is a time to start to think about. Regards, Zoltan