Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hagar.delest@laposte.net
 designates 193.253.67.236 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E67D5B8.5090107@laposte.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:36:08 +0200
From: Hagar Delest <hagar.delest@laposte.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Forum integration
References: 
 <CAPFNckhG=pCrw6vxjeRFT04_daJp+j6gQTtLfiU3fqKNa52cZg@mail.gmail.com>
  <1315332955.1994.81.camel@sybil> <1315333192.1994.82.camel@sybil>
  <CAP-ksojzNtc3opqrCFujDLj8u3rMysYr3-aaQWOPx+O-K+A7og@mail.gmail.com>
  <1315334713.1994.99.camel@sybil>
  <CAP-ksoh965Wjk1RfEd9hg3OBjkUYiY4LVVfwzKt0JZ4MdK8tNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1315336382.1994.104.camel@sybil>
In-Reply-To: <1315336382.1994.104.camel@sybil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le mar. 06 sept. 2011 15:13:02 CEST, drew <drew@baseanswers.com> a �crit :
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 14:56 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, drew<drew@baseanswers.com>  wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 14:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, drew<drew@baseanswers.com>  wrote:
>>> Not necessarily - there is the a very granular rights system in play -
>>> not everyone with the moderator colors on their user name have the same
>>> access levels. Hagar has a higher level then most, if not all, of the
>>> other moderators for instance.
>>>
>>>
>>>> they can kick real people off the boards if they do not
>>>> like their behavior. So it is a position of authority.  A Moderator is
>>>> an important role with real influence.  They, through their decisions,
>>>> help set the tone of the forum and represent the "public face" of
>>>> Apache OpenOffice.
>>>
>>> So, it is very easy to setup a system where a 'standard' moderator can
>>> do x but not y - in this case can not actually ban a user - they see
>>> spam, they remove it, which automatically makes the post visible to
>>> admins and the admin's can handle the actual banning, if so warranted.
>>>
>>
>> This is good to know.  That essentially creates super-moderators and
>> normal moderators.  Is there anything else like this?  I mean is there
>> a short list of permission sets like this, or is it really an eclectic
>> mix of permissions that have been assigned to individuals over time
>> and few moderators actually have the same identical permissions?
>
> no - normally this is all done at the group level - I gave you the one
> exception I know off (understand my memory can be faulty at times) -
> again when I say something is possible it is a mistake to believe this
> means it is being widely used, it only means that it is possible.
> //drew

I've more rights than the other moderators in the forum because I'm also part of the admin group in fact.
I guess that we can set the rights for single users but it's not the policy (too much work too).

Hagar