Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Is it worth looking at Confluence Wiki Again?
From: drew <drew@baseanswers.com>
To: giffunip@tutopia.com
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1317145151.60710.YahooMailClassic@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <1317145151.60710.YahooMailClassic@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:05:53 -0400
Message-ID: <1317146753.1961.5.camel@sybil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:39 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> 
> --- On Tue, 9/27/11, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As Rob Weir has put it ...
> ...
> > >
> > > So obviously there is limited volunteer bandwidth to
> > > migrate the wiki.
> > > And I've heard from several people, on and off
> > > the list, that much of what is on the wiki is
> > > not very useful.
> > >
> > 
> > uh, well...I don't know bout this. I was under the
> > impression that MUCH of developer info was here.
> >  Others would need to weigh in but I think it was
> > widely used because of the ease of use.
> > 
> Just my word of advice:
> 
> Check the MediaWiki at http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/
> 
> If we take out information about Hg (dead),
> the Development Teams and Projects (which will have to
> be reorganized), Old News, the issue tracker ...
> 
> Is the information left worth it to run through a
> MW-->CWiki conversion effort?
> 
> I think given the license situation we should just
> leave that stuff as read-only for now and do all new
> work on CWiki 

IMo someone needs to find out who user Hohenheim on the current wiki is
and get them to stop adding pages, cause it looks like the last couple
of hundred new pages all come form that account and all in the last
couple of weeks.

it may be that if you got that person to move the pages over to cwiki,
that the read-only version of MW is up to date with the older version
already.


@Alexandro - do you know who this is?

//drew