Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7FE28B8F for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7290 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 22:43:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7093 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 22:43:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7085 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2011 22:43:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:43:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown ipv4:200.91.200.0/24 (athena.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from [98.139.91.92] (HELO nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.92) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:43:50 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.70] by nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2011 22:43:29 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.43] by tm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2011 22:43:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2011 22:43:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 506458.94463.bm@omp1043.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 98816 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Sep 2011 22:43:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1315089809; bh=t/WyMf9iWgrpHUDprsxXom0iWoz9v3joq1Ud8n+qWBE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nyjMO0nDdnxdZMDuXNBV3h2ZlZ5OUMpI0gBCCddKcDql/BA4lw1WRdqK2IMVqpHiLZHykU2BLTwP/RWqnvlmysZpOvjeDl884Qe2j5zpAm+dyh+wYzuKrtxmsFsTWthfFcySfCjzMlHsyLvtuhIXD3vW5mTTi5K6AvQcuLhFTD8= X-YMail-OSG: zn2PBj4VM1l6QBZSfzC2qqDICmzmb.PFN0BcNXOS8uhT8xu OWuyN6BYOYgz_W.2zKbyHurSQLzCNbcGi5XSl5bGXbAQ_R7iSzMNdIEMMyjx 0oXqc0_huyfv1.sF14LUk9j_vPros3l4B3TMgcD0.8OK29NapRM_jly0flI6 dBbZSjhH8B834ziUN5U4rQua4bnpDC6VvENi_qbzdCaqUuIflV5w.8aYCznI fGbk_sis6qbHx6Ss3N92Vdg0blQLidjh4SbqxKIGD90Wl05bqwMmXBAQ0Gna B.hDi6jtDU6VDClIlfdBl6lgxoLrqvY3JWF7MvjQnDWmnNaVDa54xoZZmKc2 759etMflZs5rtue7hGTctjTTEGkjYvKqNLdIQuRxAtN9O1sB57_8vBP__Jcc y4NlYtyHsAgTCvKRBhIXC08eOM5Z65ddBvMpIkAkbmoFZN693v.Q0wNdWtK7 .IaI- Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:43:29 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.315625 Message-ID: <1315089809.68913.YahooMailClassic@web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 15:43:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com Subject: Re: Fwd: [users] Re: Languages To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, dale@casaerwin.org In-Reply-To: <4E62A405.2060504@casaerwin.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi;=0A=0A--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Dale Erwin wrote:=0A...= =0A> =0A> Spoken like a true northern Italian bigot... with all due=0A> res= pect.=0A> =0A> Please note I did not call you a northern Italian bigot...= =0A> I said you speak like one.=A0 Maybe you are just=0A> misinformed.=0A>= =0A=0AI should've thought better before my original posting because=0Athis = subject touches deep fibers in people.=0A=0AI am pretty aware that all ital= ian dialects are proper=0Alanguages that predate standard italian. They are= very=0Amuch alive in basically every city in Italy.=0A=0AThe issue is none= of these languages is actually taught=0Ain schools anymore(?) and it's usu= ally the older people=0Athat use them most. I have no objection to any of t= hem=0Abeing added to OpenOffice, it's just that many of the=0Acomputer rela= ted terms (open file, print, etc) are=0Aunlikely to change with respect to = the "official"=0Aitalian.=0A=0AYes, many people argue these languages are a= cultural=0Avalue and I am OK with them being preserved.=0A=0APedro.=0A=0AF= WIW, .. No I am not from northern Italy.