Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org
 designates 75.98.160.130 as permitted sender)
Reply-To: <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
To: <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: <00b301cc7164$58cb0470$0a610d50$@acm.org>
 <CAP-ksoiHa9MGHv6Q79cwkL3Pqf5TJahypyGsVWi-RK3wm-+7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksoiHa9MGHv6Q79cwkL3Pqf5TJahypyGsVWi-RK3wm-+7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: PLEASE STOP " RE: svn commit: r795631 - in
 /websites/production/openofficeorg:
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:06:50 -0700
Organization: NuovoDoc
Message-ID: <00c501cc716e$5dcdee60$1969cb20$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQGTm3iSUBJ/Vw4MRU6gNI0rj7at0gEEv1yClbN+HqA=
Content-Language: en-us

I'm not sure.

Absent specific details that say these pages are covered by the SGA, =
that is another reason to stop.

And even then, the standard-form SGA is not a copyright transfer.  It is =
only a license.  There has been information already that no copyright =
transferred. =20

Affixing an Apache copyright notice appears to be inappropriate in any =
case.

Affixing notices and licenses/terms has legal implications and that does =
not seem appropriate for CTR actions.=20

 - Dennis


-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org]=20
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 09:27
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Subject: Re: PLEASE STOP " RE: svn commit: r795631 - in =
/websites/production/openofficeorg:

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:
> I think it is inappropriate to make web visible duplicate and =
different pages that are presently available via the OpenOffice.org.  =
There is much more to determine before the migration of the =
OpenOffice.org content and services is staged.  There is no worked-out =
consensus on how that will progress through integration so that =
user-facing OpenOffice.org and project facing openoffice.apache.org are =
separated appropriately, if at all.
>
> More important to me is that fact that those pages don't "belong" to =
us.
>

Are you sure?

These are the static website pages per project:
http://openoffice.org/projects/native-lang

In order to check these in, the person who created these files would
have needed to sign and return the OOo contributor agreement.  So
Oracle has the ability to set a ALv2 on these.

I know this is not true in all cases for all content on the OOo
website, especially wiki content.  But don't you see how it is true in
this specific case?

Or am I missing something?

-Rob