From ooo-dev-return-4723-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Sep 2 02:17:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC1CF7506 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 02:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44845 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 02:17:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44625 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2011 02:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44616 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2011 02:17:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:17:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org designates 75.98.160.130 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.98.160.130] (HELO a2s15.a2hosting.com) (75.98.160.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:17:09 +0000 Received: from 63-226-210-225.tukw.qwest.net ([63.226.210.225] helo=Astraendo) by a2s15.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QzJJI-0007oc-E4 for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:16:48 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: <4E5E3E79.6080206@gmx.net> <00c701cc67fb$193ca9c0$4bb5fd40$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Request dev help: Info for required crypto export declaration Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:18:02 -0700 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <01bf01cc6916$8b2ef850$a18ce8f0$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJRvwQ0LcPgZoeUpBIduQz/HePbgAIHneuoAwu04o0CfbDY0AHeL+yIAZlS8GsB215pjZPHjG1w Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s15.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org I think Article 32 is of particular interest in the case of = OpenOffice.org distributions in France. It would appear that compliance with Article 30 is not difficult, since = source code is available in all cases. It would be interesting to find = out if the Apache process for declaring cryptographic provisions would = be acceptable to the Prime Minister without further ceremony. It might = be useful for us to package notice of where the details are found in = future distributions so users could be aware that local conditions may = apply to their use of such provisions. However, I think it is likely that, so long as the LibreOffice download = sites are not in the US there is not an issue for TDF. If there are = LibreOffice mirrors in the US, that might be reason for concern by the = operators of the mirrors. But we don't get to resolve any of that here. It is clear that to be an Apache Software Foundation project, the US = requirements must be satisfied in the manner specified by the ASF. =20 - Dennis=20 -----Original Message----- From: Norbert Thiebaud [mailto:nthiebaud@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 18:38 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Request dev help: Info for required crypto export = declaration On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > Looks like LO discussed it briefly [4], but dismissed it under the > misapprehension that since they are not in the US, the regulation is > irrelevant. I'm confused, how is that a 'misapprehension' exactly ? Are you concerned about compliance with http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=3DJORFTEXT000000801= 164&dateTexte=3D#LEGISCTA000006136109 ? if not, why not ? are you "under the misapprehension that since [you] are not in [France], the regulation is irrelevant." ? Norbert