incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers
Date Sun, 04 Sep 2011 18:05:30 GMT
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Being a member-based organization the ASF requires
> that all foundation activities be subject to member
> scrutiny (with only a handful of operational exceptions).
>
> I would be perfectly satisfied if the private forums
> are fully archived and made available to any ASF member on
> request, without undue delay.
>

And to all PPMC members as well.

-Rob

>
>
>
>>________________________________
>>From: Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com>
>>To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2011 11:14 AM
>>Subject: Re: Dissatisfaction amongst the community admins, moderators and volunteers
>>
>>On Sep 4, 2011 3:45 PM, "Rob Weir" <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think discussions about how the project is run is something
>>> that we should be doing in private.  Discussing such matters, even if
>>> strong opinions are raised, is the essence of transparency.  Remember,
>>> controversial is not the same as confidential.  In Apache projects we
>>> discuss non-confidential matters openly.
>>
>>... unless they are on the PPMC private list, when that royal "we" no longer
>>includes everyone here. I believe Terry and others are saying that the
>>(independent) forum community has a similar approach, with a private forum
>>for sensitive matters. I also believe that in the interests of that very
>>transparency you and others are invited to participate in that place as a
>>transitional activity.
>>
>>What exactly is the problem here?
>>
>>S.
>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message