incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Richards <mricha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?)
Date Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:32:16 GMT
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create a final export and cut over the DNS
entries? In my mind, if there is already a lot of content on the MW and the
Apache Foundation allows us to continue to use it, why not?

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni <giffunip@tutopia.com>
> wrote:
> > Hmm ...
> > It looks like  I missed where the decision to use MediiaWiki and
> deprecate confluence
> > was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date
> and
> > the extensions are documented.
> >
> > I am not complaining though: it sounds like lazy consensus in action plus
> we can
> > always change mind later on and try the conversion script.
> >
>
> Do you have a counter-argument?   I think the factors are at play were:
>
> 1) We have a huge amount of content already in MediaWiki from the
> legacy project. Although it might be converted to Confluence, the
> effort would be large.
>
> on the other hand
>
> 2) MediaWiki was not supported by Apache Infrastructure and getting it
> supported and migrated would require a lot of admin work
>
> So far, it looks like the admin effort has made more progress than the
> translation effort.   Maybe not a final decision, but that is how it
> looks to me today.
>
> -Rob
>
> > Pedro.
>



-- 
--Matt

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message