incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexandro Colorado <...@openoffice.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Is it worth looking at Confluence Wiki Again?
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:28:05 GMT
-1 I think there still many things that there need to be done for MW but I
also think that users will appreciate having their familiar environment in
this wiki.

I will vote to keep MW as Plan A. Also will start getting more involved as
the BZ.

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni <giffunip@tutopia.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello;
> >
> > --- On Tue, 9/6/11, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Pedro has already gone over to check
> > > with Infrastructure about doing a test.
> > >
> > ...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dave
> > >
> >
> > Yes, here is the post I sent to the infrastructure guys.
> > I guess they have the MW data and the confluence know-how
> > but it will probably take some time to evaluate this so
> > we cannot discard the MediaWiki VM just yet.
> >
> > Pedro.
> > ________
> > Hi guys;
> >
> > Sometime ago I suggested this utility on the ooo-dev list:
> >
> >
> >
> https://studio.plugins.atlassian.com/wiki/display/UWC/Universal+Wiki+Converter
> >
> > I didn't follow up on it because, as you know, there was a
> > volunteer from the OOo community doing the MediaWiki
> > configuration.
> >
> > Since the volunteer has left, perhaps infra could do a test
> > conversion? This would probably not go as well as the bugzilla
> > conversion but I think it would make it easier since we
> > wouldn't have to find another admin and have the extra problems
> > related to adapting new software to the Apache Infrastructure.
> >
> > Let me know if using this would be viable and you would like me
> > to raise a JIRA issue.
> >
>
> My recommendation (FWIW) would be to pass this on to infrastructure.
> Despite
> the enormous respect I have for what it took to get MediaWiki up and
> running
> for OpenOffice in the past, AND the amount of recent work that Terry did, I
> can fully understand Rob's reasoning on this. As a group, we need to face
> the fact that things are not what they used to be , and utliize the
> existing
> expertise that's available to Apache OO.o now.
>
> Setbacks are very disheartening but we do need to learn from them I think.
> It's unfortunate that exploring this alternate possibility may be construed
> as ignoring and killing someone's efforts though -- LOTS of effort I might
> add. I feel very very badly about that.  Unfortunately, this seems to be
> the nature of much reorganization, especially a reorganization on this
> scale.
>
> So, you have my +1 on filing an issue to infra to explore this conversion.
>
>
> > Pedro.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MzK
>
> "Music expresses that which cannot be said and
>  on which it is impossible to be silent."
>                                                   -- Victor Hugo
>



-- 
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* EspaƱol
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message