incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Having New Committers also be on the PPMC
Date Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:20:09 GMT
On 30 September 2011 16:48, Ross Gardler <> wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> On Sep 30, 2011 4:35 PM, "Dave Fisher" <> wrote:
> ...
>> I see no reason to stop offering PPMC membership with Committer status. If
>> the person chooses not to be on the PPMC that is fine.
>> It is not that I don't think this topic is important, but I think a more
>> important discussion is what parts of the project might require direct PPMC
>> member involvement as opposed to merely questioning and having appropriate
>> transparency into all parts to provide oversight. Do we need a PPMC member
>> directly administrating forums and wikis? Do we need the PPMC to provide a
>> generally "Lazy Consensus" approval of committers and other contributors
>> filling roles within the Forum or Wiki administration? Should the PPMC
>> require certain parts of the community to report status periodically?
> From a purely ASF point of view there are very few things that require PMC
> oversight. the following are the only ones that jump to mind:
> - release votes (which equates to IPĀ  due diligence)
> - new committers/PMC members

One more:

- board reports


View raw message