incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [proposal][www][lazy] Apache CMS Site for the OpenOffice.org Website Migration
Date Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:41:04 GMT
Am 09/14/2011 05:54 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>
> On 09/13/2011 02:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> I would like to propose the following change in approach for the
>> migration of the openoffice.org website to Apache. We should split
>> the site svn tree into two separate trees. This will allow us to
>> quickly address the divergent license, copyright, and footer issues
>> with clarity and without working against the Apache CMS's framework.
>>
>> Mixing the openoffice.org migration with the incubator site as
>> subfolders is now a plroblem. I realized I was about to bloody my
>> forehead - bash my head against a wall.
>>
>> Here are the details.
>>
>> (1) Split the current ooo/site/trunk/ and create ooo/ooosite/trunk/.
>> Move all of the openoffice.org migrated content to the ooo/ooosite/
>> site tree. Each site will now have its own templates/skeleton.html
>> with correct license headers, copyrights, and terms.
>>
>> (2) Request that infrastructure attach the new ooo/ooosite/ tree to
>> the cms buildbot and webgui. If Infrastructure is willing I propose
>> -
>>
>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/.
>>
>> If it must start as part of the incubator then
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ooo/
>>
>> (3) Every AOOo committer will be enabled to use the Apache CMS's
>> webgui to make edits in order to align the site's policies to the new
>> project. It has been confirmed that it is possible to edit the source
>> html in the WebGUI / Bookmarklet. As Dennis has written these should
>> be minimal.
>>
>> (4) No changeover of the current www.openoffice.org until the project
>> agrees.
>>
>> I'll start the tree splitting process this Friday in 72 hours
>> allowing plenty of time for comments and consensus.
>
> +1 from me, and thanks...

Also from me a +1, good idea to split-up the two parts.

Marcus


Mime
View raw message