incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffu...@tutopia.com>
Subject Re: [EXT][DISCUSS] Including Groovy as a scripting language
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:24:39 GMT
Hello;

--- On Tue, 9/27/11, Shane Curcuru wrote:
..
> 
> I.e. there are cases where Apache projects may want to
> include Category-B (EPL, CPL, MPL, etc.) tools within a
> distribution.  This is permitted in binary form, but
> not source form.
>

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but dmake as we have it
today clearly lies in this category.

 
> With these tools in binary form in the Apache release, a
> user is unlikely to attempt to modify that non-Apache
> licensed source code (which they'd have to go find
> themselves) without clearly realizing that that portion of
> the Apache release is not under our Apache license.
> 

Concerning the external sources that we still carry: would
source tarballs of MPL/LGPL stuff be considered binary form?
This is mostly what we do today so it would solve
most of our issues (gettext still has to go), but that
workaround would remove the motivation to further cleanup
of the source (glibc could stay!)

Pedro.

Mime
View raw message