incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: Bug reporting, handling rules
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:28:53 GMT
Anonymous emails from pseudonyms with invalid email addresses.

Here is the header and "nike.apache.org" did handle the email.

Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28127 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2011 17:54:19 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
   by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:54:19 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0
	tests=FH_FROMEML_NOTLD,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [212.27.42.2] (HELO smtp2-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.2)
   by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:54:10 +0000
Received: from zimbra60-e10.priv.proxad.net (unknown [172.20.243.210])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B7F4B00A9
	for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Wed,  7 Sep 2011 19:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: FR web forum <OOo@nike.apache.org>
Reply-To: oooforum@free.fr
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bug reporting, handling rules
Message-ID: <20816240-dbc9-4dc9-a41d-15621d7def93@zimbra60-e10.priv.proxad.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E67A2DE.3070003@hdsnet.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [92.136.171.189]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.2_GA_3270 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/7.1.2_GA_3270)
X-Authenticated-User: oooforum@free.fr
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I believe that Apache Infra could ban this using SpamAssassin with a rule saying don't accept
external email that says its from itself with an invalid email address.

Regards,
Dave


On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

> Yes "FR web forum" is apparently operating pseudonymously *and* anonymously.  Those mails
often copied oooforum@free.fr also, and I switched to replying to thatthat until I realized
that I was simply cross-posting to yet-another list.
> 
> - Dennis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2wave@comcast.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 13:30
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bug reporting, handling rules
> 
> Prior to this post this person was using OOo@athena.apache.org
> 
> How are either of these real or valid? Is this post coming from the test forum?
> 
> Shouldn't a moderator turn this subscription off? (or not allow it in?)
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> 
>> Don't set your From address to an @nike.apache.org address.  Set it to
>> a real email address.
>> 
>> FR web forum wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 19:53:44 +0200:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On OOo QA site can be found three page <cut>
>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html
>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/bug_writing_guidelines.html
>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/basic_rules.html
>>> We have also translated documents in the wiki.services.oo.o, example:
>>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Fr.openoffice.org/IssueTracker
>>> 
>>> And probably that these pages exist in other languages
>>> 
>>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message