incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
Subject RE: "LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later"
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:33:42 GMT
Yes, the addition of committers is mainly the continuing arrival of Initial Committers.  The
number of newly-invited committers is growing, however, and these tend to be quite active
in their contributions.

The number submitting changes is limited to those active with the code base (or web site maintenance).
 So the list of names on commit messages is a select group.  I think the number of non-committer
patches can be counted on one hand.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d.s@daniel.shahaf.name] 
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:40
To: Rob Weir
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: "LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.org one year later"

Rob Weir wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:03:08 -0400:
> An interesting new article in Lwn.net by Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier.
> 
> https://lwn.net/Articles/458974/
> 
> There are a couple factual errors there in describing our project:
> 
> 1) The article claims that we have not added any committers since the
> project started
> 
> Obviously this is not true.  It is easily to verify by looking at our
> recent reports:
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2011 (72 committers)
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011 (71 committers)
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2011 (56 committers)
> 
> You don't need to take off your shoes and count on your toes to see
> that we have more committers than when we started.
> 

How many of the 15 committers added in August submitted a patch (or got
a patch they had sent applied) during that timeframe?


Mime
View raw message