Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of apache@robweir.com designates
 69.89.21.11 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110803134504.297300@gmx.net>
References: <008a01cc4ee7$ca79e5e0$5f6db1a0$@acm.org>
	<4E37F50B.1040405@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksohNZFBRdrSVw+kE67JksCD_5_9h80sOX+gfer4-4+rNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E380C1F.20509@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksojnUTo71Fmks4LbJ8+LhZgStGgRsxgkRhBWAPrLPPTAfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E382162.4070003@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<4E38387E.7010108@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<7C969586-8429-4A26-9AD2-39AEF92FBDC5@comcast.net>
	<4E38418C.3070104@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<CAP-ksoiJLxPJdMYxUmJnirU3Mv9SmM-3i_nmrhZexS5cJ8sm1g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E384F4A.20100@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<CAP-ksogARZZqti4WTiQN5m687w5eVU4E0naCHErtV5iCoo0r6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEsUX0LpW-Wj=ueeiYqVsj3V7ghoHeEAKpMcd7j9p0TFbkBseA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoi+GLAiSCD_9w9-8DEvEzHYPHVQXou2O7r7WVy2gLuAig@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEsUX0K0pn8xNXZ+LRSL3+D-W7aG1GRC+Y4se8gAkbv8cePC9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksogiBMTGkJ=0N_x5kUWq07UDoTSS+aYaGKZuBZuguRCrjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110803115820.297310@gmx.net>
	<CAP-ksogXVjL1PavePwq9pUH-U15Rj5T32Vkh5t2jJb=xnaQ7Uw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E3946DD.3090207@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksogHmCbi8X2r5HD8ozSTwFOgk6NZvFP=HZ9RuozRP6tzXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110803134504.297300@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:51:23 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksoin1suWvBRar2HOwkDx8SFJAD0MtsvR644cfgjHDNFNag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was
 re:OpenOffice.org branding)
From: Rob Weir <apache@robweir.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Andre Schnabel <Andre.Schnabel@gmx.net> wro=
te:
> Hi Rob,
>
>> Von: Rob Weir <apache@robweir.com>
>
>>
>> Sorry, replacing Andre's speculation with your speculation is not the
>> same as introducing facts.
>
> I did not do any speculation in my mail, the only thing I did was
> to quote (again) Manfred's questions (that you did not see before).
>
> A simple:
> - no I did not poke the data from a year ago
> and
> - no I will not speculations why access to OOo wiki is increasing or
> decreasing
>
> would have been sufficient answers.
>
>
> There is no need to try to find something in my mails what I didn't actua=
lly write.
>

Andre,  perhaps you forgot, but you did speculate on this earlier in
the thread, when you wrote:

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Andre Schnabel <Andre.Schnabel@gmx.net> wr=
ote:
> Hi,
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Von: Rob Weir <apache@robweir.com>
>
>> > We already have two separate wikis, one that the community uses and on=
e
>> that requires committers to make the changes.  I notice the second one i=
s
>> not getting much activity.
>> >
>>
>> And I'm not seeing a lot of activity at the OpenOffice.org wiki either:
>>
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=3DSpecial:RecentCh=
anges&from=3D20110702130619&days=3D30&limit=3D500
>>
>> What does that prove?
>
>
> that OpenOffice.org is a project with (still) a strong name but without
> community contributions?
>
> scnr
>
> Andr=C3=A9
>


> regards,
>
> Andr=C3=A9
>
>
>